13 comments

  • spdustin 32 minutes ago
    I'm going to assume Claude did the heavy lifting here (because it's Q4 2026 and the odds are in my favor), so if I'm right: this is one of the best examples of the way LLMs can empower users to not only scratch all the itches, but demonstrate to anyone who stumbles by just how satisfying it can be to do so themselves.

    Your app represents a future that I, an old, actually love. When I see projects like this, I don't think about ongoing support or if the project will be abandoned. I think, "Woah, I hadn't thought of that. Now I'm going to try it. Because why wouldn't I try to get all the value I can out of my $20/month Claude subscription?"

    Even though I've been a developer for 30+ years (and a nerd for longer), I've never felt so motivated by the potential of a technology to make an individual's life richer. Thanks for sharing it.

    And if you wrote it by hand, my hat's off to you for sharing that, too.

    • SoftTalker 1 minute ago
      It's cool, and it's nice to see people rebelling against the "hardware I bought held hostage to a subscription" business model, but if you use an AI to do this and don't understand what it's done, you've just traded one subscription dependency for another.
    • simpsoka 28 minutes ago
      ChatGPT, but close! You're right, I likely wouldn't have approached the project if I had to write it all by hand. But it was fairly easy with AI, and I was impressed with the results. The days of personalized software are here. I built it exactly to my spec - similar to Adobe suite, and with built in MCP support.
    • sjs382 17 minutes ago
      Imagine if RMS had access to Claude and wasn't activated by the need to modify printer software himself. We might not have the FSF, GNU, GPL, or anything downstream from those!
    • tencentshill 6 minutes ago
      So how much would you pay to be able to do that? $30, 40, 100? Once they IPO, they'll find out exactly how much they can sell the same things back to you for.
  • lanewinfield 10 minutes ago
    Super cool, but I wish you said both what your $300 machine is and also what machines this is compatible with somewhere very clear.
    • yegle 4 minutes ago
      Brother Skitch PP1, from the research I did when I saw the initial tweet.
  • thedellmonitor 20 minutes ago
    I'll have to give this a try. Back when I was trying to do embroidery with my $300 machine, I found that Hatch was the only software that would consistently give me good results. The only problem was that Hatch (at the time) was over $1,000 USD. I am a hobbyist, I refuse to pay that much for a hobby I hardly engage with. The saving grace there was that Hatch had a 30 day free trial, which I could continue to renew with a different email.

    About a year into doing this, they patched it so the license server would save your HWID and would not run in a VM anymore. I decided to just give up on the hobby right there.

    Maybe this will finally get me to pull the machine out of the garage and get back into it!

    • simpsoka 16 minutes ago
      If you give it a try, let me know! Would love to see how it works for you.
  • mmmlinux 30 minutes ago
    Interesting, Youtuber William Osman is also working on something similar, but for full size industrial machines. I'm not sure if its public released yet though.

    Also don't forget Linus him self wrote one of the embroidery machine drivers for Linux.

    • itomato 17 minutes ago
      Interesting. I have been having fun working on "NewHat" for a while - meant for Toyota/Tajima machines. https://github.com/wjkennedy/NewHat/blob/feature/model-train...

      I used to use the Melco and Pantagrams digitizing software and operated kiosks doing custom embroidery.

      People always asked "can I get anything on a hat?" The reasons I said no before no longer exist.

      Punching out a DST is not the same as clean sewouts and NewHat attempts some machine emulation and classification of generated designs. They're virtually sewn and ranked for some reinforcement learning.

  • Gys 44 minutes ago
    The readme does not specify which brand(s) or machine(s) are supported? It only mentions BT for communication? Is there then a kind of standard protoc?
    • simpsoka 40 minutes ago
      It works with most machines and exports to a variety of formats. Most embroidery machines you connect a usb drive to. The specific machine I used, the Brother PP1, allows you to connect over bluetooth.
  • ergojoe 6 minutes ago
    We're going to see more of this. Like the guy that made the custom Mac print driver. Most companies put zero effort into making sure things like this aren't homebrew hackable.
  • Ccecil 16 minutes ago
    Years ago I ran across another project doing similar. Embroidermodder.

    https://www.libembroidery.org/

    Always room for another though.

  • athst 8 minutes ago
    This is a really cool use case for AI coding. Well done
  • curtisblaine 29 minutes ago
    We should kill subscription models with LLMs app by app (and possibly server by server) until hardware is sold as standalone hardware with no strings attached. I don't care if this slows down r&d or makes printers more expensive. Hardware vendors have abused the subscription model to a point that they can't be trusted with it.
    • Rohansi 20 minutes ago
      I'd love a replacement for Cricut's software. You don't need a subscription for it but a few features are locked behind a subscription, and they nag a lot, and it's just so bad.
    • simpsoka 26 minutes ago
      I think they initially sold this machine at a loss because of the subscription, and now they sell it even lower because people really don't want their hardware locked into a subscription.
  • jLaForest 58 minutes ago
    very cool, thanks for sharing.

    what machine would you recommend to someone looking to get into this as a hobby?

    • simpsoka 46 minutes ago
      I went with the Brother Skitch PP1. It's right around $300 on amazon. It has sub-par reviews, but I realized that most of those were because of the poorly built software and subscription fee. So far, it has worked really well for me! Edit: here is a video/image of a patch I made: https://x.com/simpsoka/status/2115254318161182876
      • barcoder 36 minutes ago
        In the past I've been really impressed by Brother products so I'm surprised to hear about their subscription model.

        What benefits (if any) does the subscription offer?

        • simpsoka 33 minutes ago
          I think they didn't intend for the bluetooth protocol to be reverse engineered. The free version of the software you really can't do much (limited colors, tools). I believe they also have some clip-art that they make available with the subscription. It's pretty bad.
  • joshu 45 minutes ago
    The supplied software is truly terrible.
  • pantryscale 50 minutes ago
    [flagged]
  • tintor 28 minutes ago
    Vegan, Crossfit, and Burning Man joke now needs to include "builds with Rust" too.