How Do You Take a Picture of a Black Hole?

(quantamagazine.org)

24 points | by dverlaeckt80 2 hours ago

5 comments

  • rustyhancock 1 hour ago
    One of the most remarkable aspects of physics is that Newtonian gravity calculations are quite spot on for all the parts of black holes layfolk consider important.

    1. Both predict the same critical radius, now called the Schwarzschild radius.

    2. Both predict a central singularity with formally infinite density in idealised collapse.

    3. Both predict exactly the same finite time to fall into the singularity under equivalent idealised conditions.

    4. Both give the same equation for radial free fall, using different definitions of time.

    What GR added was meaning to these things (and of course precise calculations outside of very idealised scenarios and symmetric conditions).

    • ant6n 1 hour ago
      Newtonian gravity gives infinite time to fall into black hole?

      I thought you need at least special relativity for time dilution.

      • rustyhancock 38 minutes ago
        Both have finite time falling in to the singularity. If you use a point test particle Newton and GR agree on that finite time.

        That's proper time I.e. the infalling particles wristwatch time.

        In GR, external observers would never see the infalling particle cross the event horizon but that's a coordinate artifact. If using our wrist watch time for that particle.

    • ziiinq 1 hour ago
      [dead]
  • myrmidon 1 hour ago
    What I find really interesting is that black holes don't really "require" infinite density; the mass density inside the event horizon never exceeds neutron star levels, and becomes in fact lower the heavier the black hole gets (=> event horizon enclosed volume grows faster than mass).
    • Borg3 27 minutes ago
      For large blackholes of course. And this actually makes other interesting property. Our universe is in fact giant blackhole with our own event horizon outside it. This also support cyclic big bang theory. Once entire universe will collapse to singularity, the smallest possible particles shatters, leaving pure energy. Pure energy doesnt have "static" mass so no gravity => kaboom, we have new iteration. Theory of multiverse (multiple black holes aka universes) is out of scope here because we will never be able to escape ours.
  • monster_truck 1 hour ago
    I'd use a camera, personally
  • spottedmarley 1 hour ago
    First you'll need a camera that can detect mathematical equations.
  • JohnKemeny 1 hour ago
    Is it just me, or could they have added a, say, picture of a black hole?
    • cogogo 8 minutes ago
      I thought I was the only one. But there is a really good video linked at the bottom of the page that has the two images and a summary of the work to build them.

      I also loved the analogies of reading the date of a coin in LA from NYC or seeing a tangerine on the moon. But they kept talking about how surprisingly small black holes are. I wanted that described in relative terms. Maybe I just did not read carefully enough but are they the size of a pinhead? The solar system? I know I can look this up.

    • bcraven 1 hour ago
      It's the one in your head that you picture, as not many have been taken:

      https://www.si.edu/newsdesk/releases/astronomers-reveal-firs...

      • somat 10 minutes ago
        The EHT is a remarkable achievement in datagathering and collaboration. But I always sort of wonder, a bit of doubt if you will. seeing as the process(simplified nearly to the point of absurdity) is that of building a image generator based off what we think a black hole looks like then feeding it very vague spectral data and getting it to generate an image. isn't that a huge confirmation bias. That is. of course the black hole looks like simulated ones, that is how the generator was programmed to make them.
      • GreenLightGo 42 minutes ago
        Why does it look like it's moving to me?
      • lifestyleguru 52 minutes ago
        I remember times when the best available photo of Pluto looked like this.
    • ButlerianJihad 1 hour ago
      This is a transcript of a 60-minute podcast. Would you like that TIFF in Zmodem format? Or they could read it out in base64?