I'm in a Meeting

(iminafleeting.com)

224 points | by splintersio 5 hours ago

35 comments

  • frangonf 2 hours ago
    This has real demand, I ended up in the Gitlab secondary youtube channel one day, ordering by most views, and I found a video [0] of a seemingly normal uninteresting meeting with millions of views. Turns out people were using this as an excuse for looking like they were busy. They disabled comments now but I saved some of them because I thought it was hilarious:

    I play this when I need my family to leave me alone - so helpful 4.5K I play this when I pretend to be busy. This meeting is literally about anything you want it to be about lol 1.5K I love that we all arrived at this video for the same reason 2.6K Every now and then I'll pause it at a good point in between them talking to make my own voice heard contributing to the "meeting" lol. Gets the full effect in! And the beautiful thing is their conversation just flows with it like they heard me lol. 562

    [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBVtvOpU80Q

    • broken-kebab 2 hours ago
      For people without adblocker the trick will be ruined at some point by something like loud enthusiastic ClickUp ad.
      • twoodfin 2 hours ago
        I was one of those people skeptical that ad-free YouTube was worth the high price, but now firmly a convert.

        Get it! The best deal in streaming content. Unlocks such a better experience you’ll find a dozen whole new areas of valuable & enjoyable content to explore.

        • Barbing 2 minutes ago
          One of the best products ever created, and they deserve the dough for serving me all the gigabytes. Fast, reliable, and one product not headed for KilledByGoogle. (Did I jinx it? “We’re transitioning to a vertical-video only platform to meet our billion users where they are…”)
        • tyromaniac 2 hours ago
          Why not just block ads?
          • phoghed 2 minutes ago
            1. YouTube is my primary entertainment so I don’t mind paying for it in lieu of Netflix or Hulu or whatever

            2. I like that it directly benefits the creators of the videos I watch

            3. It gets everyone in my family ad free viewing for 0 effort across all devices (I primarily watch it from Apple TV app)

            4. Gives you higher quality bitrate option sometimes

            5. It gives me the moral and logical high ground when arguing with nerds about YouTube online

          • billypilgrim 3 minutes ago
            Or, you know, you could just pay for a service that you enjoy. I watch a lot more YouTube and see a bigger need to keep it alive than Netflix, HBO and co for which I am paying good money already, why should YouTube be exempt from that? Also if Netflix goes away tomorrow, you’ll find their content on torrents easily, but if YouTube goes away, we will lose decades of videos that no one has backups of. Expecting them to offer this service for free and without ads is crazy.
          • stackskipton 1 hour ago
            At some point, paying for something and knowing it will work is worth it. In particular, ad blocking YouTube on mobile is frustrating.
            • baud147258 6 minutes ago
              I've been using YT on my FF mobile browser with an ad block and it's been working great.
            • pimlottc 1 hour ago
              Not getting sucked into YouTube on mobile is a feature, not a bug
            • prmoustache 1 hour ago
              Had they done that from day 1 you woulf have a point but it sounds like extorsion to me given youtube got rid of most of its competition and established its casi monopolistic position being adfree.
              • nlarew 0 minutes ago
                That is not what extortion means
            • bluGill 1 hour ago
              If you can. A lot of subscription TV channels have ads even though you have to pay to get them. Does paying for youtube block all ads, and if so will it continue to, or will they change as so many others have and just make your payment remove some ads? I'm not even counting sponsored content in a lot of videos as ads, but they are annoying too.
              • ericbarrett 1 hour ago
                If you are a YouTube Premium subscriber you actually do get a button that skips in-video sponsor ads.
            • busssard 1 hour ago
              NewPipe is the way to do that on android...
              • AdmiralAsshat 15 minutes ago
                Smarttube on Android TV's works exceptionally well, too. I've seen people recommend Tizentube over it because it's nearly indistinguishable from the standard YouTube app, but with adblocking--but I actually prefer the more minimalist UI of Smarttube.
                • busssard 0 minutes ago
                  is there something for IOS?
              • JCattheATM 26 minutes ago
                Yup. Astounding how many tech people just fork over money to an evil company instead though.
            • globular-toast 1 hour ago
              They could raise the price or start having ads even if you pay. You're a renter. You have no rights.
          • sixothree 9 minutes ago
            Because with google it's an unwinnable arms race.
          • RiverCrochet 52 minutes ago
            I don't block ads because stealing ad revenue from companies is unethical. These companies have workers who have families that they need to feed. They provide a service for free, so it's the least I can do. I watch every ad in full.

            My cousin, however, stopped blocking ads on YouTube when the YouTube warnings showed up. She is scared that at some point Google would ban Gmail accounts for doing it, and she's had hers for 10 years and really relies on it. She also says YouTube videos are really easy to download so anything she really wants from YouTube she tends to have a local copy of.

            • bee_rider 8 minutes ago
              It isn’t unethical to block ads; the norm on the internet has always been that senders send any not-actively-malicious bits we want and the recipient renders them however they want (including not).

              That said I’m also worried about getting banned for blocking too many YouTube ads (Google doesn’t have any obligation to send me emails after all) so I… just don’t go there.

            • tyromaniac 29 minutes ago
              You're right, I didn't think about the thousands left destitute by them using UBlock Origin to play a fake meeting video
            • ArvidSu 43 minutes ago
              Corporate psy-op
            • maxbond 39 minutes ago
              The mafia is also made of hard working people with families to feed. Sometimes industries deserve to die. Even if the people working in them don't deserve to lose their jobs. That's life in a free market.
              • RiverCrochet 6 minutes ago
                There's nothing more "free market" than ads. Ads literally cost you no money (free), and you don't even have to buy the product they're advertising (freedom from market if desired). If I know I'm not going to buy the product in question, I use the time to meditate, or take a moment to enjoy a cool, crisp sip of Kool-Aid. It's delicious when prepared according to the instructions. Oh Yeah!
        • Taurenking 2 hours ago
          [dead]
      • splintersio 22 minutes ago
        I’ll disable ads! Apologies :)
    • prmoustache 1 hour ago
      Are they monetizing it? If not they are missing out!
    • ruszki 2 hours ago
      Why don't you just decline calls with text messages, or just ignore them, or simply mute your phone?
      • flurdy 45 minutes ago
        You try ignoring when the family helpdesk is called. You never hear the end of it.
      • bonoboTP 2 hours ago
        People take offense.
        • ubermonkey 1 hour ago
          So?
        • seb1204 1 hour ago
          You would not know as you declined?
        • cheonic4040 1 hour ago
          > People take offense.

          Sounds like something people low on the corporate ladder say

          • bonoboTP 40 minutes ago
            Yes. These tools are for them. If you're high on the ladder you can play Solitaire openly.
  • alexpotato 12 minutes ago
    At a past firm I managed a team of SREs.

    This was very much a "fire drill all the time" kind of place (vs "slow and steady"). The team came to me and said:

    "Alex, we keep getting bombarded by meeting requests and have no focus time."

    My solution was to create a weekly "team meeting" from 8am to 11am every Friday and invite all of them to it.

    They loved it!

    I mentioned to them that making a meeting like this was something they could have done themselves but they responded:

    "It carries more weight coming from you. Plus, if someone tries to schedule over it, they are more likely to think twice and/or I can say 'Hey, you have to talk to Alex.' "

  • filcuk 1 hour ago
    The scripts are hilarious, yet not inaccurate. I can't stop chuckling. 'Are you happy with that?' 'Happy is a strong word' 'OK' moves on to the next topic
  • tacostakohashi 2 hours ago
    Reminds me of the "boss mode" / "boss key" in old games, like MS-DOS days, which would switch the screen to some spreadsheet mockup or suchlike, updated for the current century.
    • flurdy 43 minutes ago
      https://hackertyper.com/ and others. Full screen code stream
    • karim79 44 minutes ago
      I think Sierra games like Leisure Suit Larry had that (F11) if I recall correctly. Priceless.
    • jnovek 1 hour ago
      This was tickling something in my brain and this was it! Thank you.
  • voidUpdate 2 hours ago
    Do people in offices typically just blast meetings out of their computer speakers? Everyone I work with uses headphones so we're not disturbing other people in the office...
    • p_l 2 hours ago
      Unless you have good ANC headphones, or find something like pink noise that fits you, you're still dealing with all the talking to microphone of your colleagues.
      • sixothree 0 minutes ago
        It's hard to describe how difficult it is to hear someone talking and then a second later hear then in your headphones. It really breaks my concentration. And it's a solvable technology problem - just use the local network for people in the same subnet. But every meeting provider wants _everything_ routed through their servers. There's no escaping they prying eyes.
      • Tajnymag 1 hour ago
        It's less noisy when you hear 5 people talk in 5 meetings than when you hear 50 people talk in those 5 remote meetings.
      • voidUpdate 2 hours ago
        I have reasonably good headphones and nice music
  • ninkendo 2 hours ago
    Audio seems broken now, maybe hugged to death. Console:

      HTTP load failed with status 404. Load of media resource https://iminafleeting.com/media/people/standup-a.mp4 failed
    • jmuguy 51 minutes ago
      There's a few that don't work, I was able to get the some of the "scoping" meetings to play the audio.
  • roryirvine 4 hours ago
    Truly uncanny!

    Only the British audio works for me, though - if I try American or International, the relevant meetings are silent with a "Join Audio" button which doesn't appear to do anything. (Firefox on MacOS, if that's useful)

    • flurdy 47 minutes ago
      Yeah we need a dial to mix accents and dialects, and level of English fluency. I could want 50% English, maybe some Northern English, Welsh or Scottish, and mix in Indian accents, various American, Spanish, Portuguese, Polish, Scandinavian, the odd token Aussie. Etc.

      That I could enable more South African, or Middle East accents in some meetings would be true to real life as well.

      Not Finnish. The silence would not work :)

    • moritzwarhier 1 hour ago
      Same, console says something about missing or "unsuitable" audio resources.

      Sad, I wanted the international broken Zoom call

    • fliglr 2 hours ago
      Same here - Brave browser. Only British works
  • TrackerFF 1 hour ago
    We need a fake teams / zoom UI with faces talking. You know, for those working in open plan.
  • splintersio 17 minutes ago
    I’ve disabled adsense so you guys can enjoy it with UX in mind - tho I have allowed for adverts to sneak into the meetings cough
  • ghusto 1 hour ago
    If you can't tell people you want to concentrate on your work, there's either something very wrong with where you work, or you.
    • elonfboy 1 hour ago
      You must be a hoot at parties
  • whilenot-dev 2 hours ago
    What are all the names for the category of such software... "Self-defense Software", "Busy Simulation Software", "Faux Work Software", "Fake Meeting Software"[0], "Virtual Meeting Simulator"[1], "Prank Screens"[2], ...? Are there many others?

    [0]: https://fakemeeting.app/

    [1]: https://z.tools/t/fake-meeting

    [2]: https://www.whitescreen.online/

    • TeMPOraL 2 hours ago
      Computer-Aided Boundaries? Social Assistive Software?
    • whh 2 hours ago
      I'd say a quintessentially British, tactical-yet-polite social interaction deterrent
  • Loughla 23 minutes ago
    This is not making me feel good about the real meetings I'm regularly in.
  • arjonagelhout 2 hours ago
    Brilliant, this website is blocked at my work: "This content is blocked by your organization".
    • esikich 1 hour ago
      It's because it's a new domain. Very common in corporate IT.
      • arjonagelhout 1 hour ago
        I didn't know that was a thing, but that makes sense. Thanks!
  • jvanderbot 1 hour ago
    Where's the HR-faced "Can everyone turn on their cameras please?" one with 200 people in the call.
  • DharmaPolice 2 hours ago
    Trying to access this site on my corporate Windows laptop and it was blocked "by your IT admin" (in Windows itself, not the browser/proxy). So it's already on some kind of list.
    • whh 2 hours ago
      New domain registrations typically aren't on a list yet, which, in itself gets blocked.
  • tome 1 hour ago
    Maybe a silly question, but without video isn't this obviously fake? Or is it normal for all participants on a call to be audio only?
    • mcbuilder 1 hour ago
      Pretty normal. Camera's usually stay off unless it's a 1-1, presentation, or maybe a VP level call.
    • astura 7 minutes ago
      Totally normal. The only time I ever used my camera is conducting interviews.
    • dirkc 1 hour ago
      If you find use for this tool, chances are good that you're in an place where all the participants would be audio only
    • p_l 1 hour ago
      It's normal in many places for the only video to be shared screen
    • seb1204 1 hour ago
      Depends on the company, the team, the agenda etc
  • karim79 1 hour ago
    Fantastic product! Needs people talking over each other for greater authenticity, I reckon.
  • tamimio 8 minutes ago
    This is hilarious, but I think people should be addressing the real issue instead of this, maybe that work environment isn’t for you and it’s time to look somewhere if you need to pretend. Just say you’re busy or fill your calendar with whatever you are working on without a meeting, in fact, a lot of meetings is a sign of a wasted time so if I see someone (especially technical) is doing a lot of meeting I know they are wasting time or slacking.
  • vermooten 1 hour ago
    I retired a few months ago. These calls have taken me back to the horror of working in tech. It must be what PTSD is like.
  • mystifyingpoi 1 hour ago
    Reminds me of the fake Windows Update page.
    • yabones 1 hour ago
      Takes me back. I remember there was a version of the fake Windows 8 update sequence that had it infinitely loop between "Working on updates..." and the frowny-face :( BSOD
  • jonwinstanley 2 hours ago
    This is fun. The audio isn’t particularly believable. Not that it matters for this project.

    I’ve used a few tts providers and although a technical marvel they are all still easily identifiable as ai. Humans are very good at spotting fakes.

    This project might work better with mostly canned audio clips of real humans.

    • xbar 25 minutes ago
      I disagree. I think many of the audio elements are highly believable for lay people.
  • aronhegedus 1 hour ago
    Minor but when I took myself off mute, my box didn't reflect that. Not sure if bug or a feature.
  • spuz 2 hours ago
    I am missing something about how this could hypothetically be useful. If I played this in the background it would be far too distracting to get any actual work done.
  • soltanov 2 hours ago
    Simple solution for focus time. If it stops people from setting up an actual meeting for something that fits in an email, it is already doing critical infrastructure work.
  • niek_pas 1 hour ago
    I'm not getting any audio, bunch of 404s on loop.m4a... anyone else?

    EDIT: seems like British audio does work

  • wkumfer 2 hours ago
    Please add other language versions! Should be easy to do, and would help us from non-English speaking countries.
  • alienbaby 39 minutes ago
    is this what other peoples meetings are like? huh.
  • ButlerianJihad 2 hours ago
  • martythemaniak 1 hour ago
    Nice, it's got real Interdimensional Cable vibes.
  • 7174n6 5 hours ago
    Awesome, if I worked in the UK.
  • dizhn 1 hour ago
    I'm gonna ironically make a Claude theme and use that if I ever hand write a site again. :)
  • mchav 1 hour ago
    Can we just be honest?
  • kirugan 2 hours ago
    haha, now I can always use this website if I don't want to be interrupted lol