Pnpm 12.0

(pnpm.io)

24 points | by jcbhmr 1 hour ago

6 comments

  • magnio 12 minutes ago
    The more I read these ass Claude Opus writings the more I believe AGI is further away from us.
  • xiaoyu2006 1 minute ago
    Time to hop off I guess. They don't even bother to write changlog on their own.
  • BlueGreenMagick 12 minutes ago
    > It is a rewrite of pnpm in Rust

    Their benchmarks[0] report that a clean install with lockfile is about 3x times faster (7s -> 2.2s) and a no-op install is about 29x times faster (517ms -> 18ms)

    [0]: https://pnpm.io/benchmarks

  • ledoncool 11 minutes ago
    Hooray!
  • winterqt 15 minutes ago
    Good to see the maintainers don't care enough to take the time to write a release blogpost themselves. sigh
    • paavohtl 8 minutes ago
      I was also bothered by this. I don't care if you use LLMs to write most or all of your code, but at least have the courtesy of actually writing your blog posts & readmes, to demonstrate that you at least understand what the LLM generated for you.
  • mmmeff 25 minutes ago
    Am I the only one that hates the decision to no longer support corepack?
    • winterqt 13 minutes ago
      Is "pnpm installs the other package managers" what you're talking about, or something else? That doesn't quite read like removing corepack support to me, though I might be missing something obvious.
    • mirekrusin 7 minutes ago
      pnpm 12 supports corepack (or better phrased - corepack supports pnpm 12).

      they just don't recommend it.

      nodejs stopped bundling corepack since node 25, maybe you're referring to that?

    • catlifeonmars 22 minutes ago
      Same here. Corepack was fine and there is already too much churn
    • joshuat 18 minutes ago
      First I'm hearing of it, and it does dampen my enthusiasm for v12 a bit.