Doom entirely from DNS records

(github.com)

83 points | by Venn1 3 days ago

13 comments

  • thestackfox 2 minutes ago
    Respect. But also ... WHY????

    Now let's do

    (1) A DNS file drop: Split small files into TXT records and rebuild them client-side. Useless for big files, perfect for config blobs, tiny payloads, and cursed demos. Also someone can write an S3-compatible client.

    (2) Redis DNS:

    - GET foo.cache.example.com -> TXT record returns value chunks

    - TTL is the eviction policy

    - Cache invalidation becomes even more of a hate crime.

  • ktpsns 1 hour ago
    To clarify, a good title would be "Loading Doom entirely from DNS records"

    Neither one plays Doom over DNS nor is the first paragraph in the README correct, because DNS is only abused for storage, not for computing/processing/executing instructions:

    > At some point, a reasonable person asked "DNS resolves names to IP addresses, what else can it do?" The answer, apparently, is run DOOM.

    • drob518 1 hour ago
      Yup. A better title might be “Author discovers data can be stored in DNS TXT records which were created to store data.”
    • akdev1l 1 hour ago
      Also we could probably achieve this by using dnsfs and regular doom install

      https://blog.benjojo.co.uk/post/dns-filesystem-true-cloud-st...

    • b112 1 hour ago
      You make me wonder if it is possible. All you need to do is to programmatically change bits, and you have compute. Some cache monkeying or somethong.

      Of course, I imagine it would be incredibly slow.

      • testaccount28 40 minutes ago
        > All you need to do is to programmatically change bits, and you have compute.

        all you need is to rapidly push off one foot and land on the other, and you have running.

  • LetsGetTechnicl 1 hour ago
    This novel form of data storage reminds of me of this classic YouTube video, Harder Drive: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcJSW7Rprio
  • nasretdinov 1 hour ago
    Waiting for Doom over https://github.com/yarrick/pingfs next
  • hhh 47 minutes ago
    very cool, i did something similar but turning the doom frame running on a server into ascii (with colour) and then a small shim to give inputs via subdomains

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GoPWuJR6Npc

    without the colour i did it in a worse way for bad apple

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJ2Q12vYojY

  • kaitari 58 minutes ago
    I never stop being impressed by these "<something-crazy> running Doom" posts. AFAIC, whenever we get to Mars, we won't truly have arrived until someone is playing Doom on Mars, and without wasting valuable resources by doing so. Running Doom, the canonical measurement of truly mastering a thing's capabilities.
  • nullbyte808 29 minutes ago
    Malware could still use DNS records for storage and access to bootstrapped payloads correct?
    • thesuitonym 13 minutes ago
      Yes, but it's not a problem, any more than downloading any arbitrary text is. You'd still have to have something execute the binary.
    • k4rnaj1k 2 minutes ago
      [dead]
  • tombert 1 hour ago
    Gotta admit that it didn't occur to me that "can it run DOOM?" would stretch all the way to DNS.

    At this point I am wondering if people will somehow port DOOM over to the MONIAC.

  • lxgr 34 minutes ago
    A database storing data? Now I’ve seen everything!
  • hun3 47 minutes ago
    Finally, a DOOM download that bypasses captive portals
  • cat-turner 1 hour ago
    Super cool. Never thought of this. Would this be useful for seeding LLMs?
    • FartyMcFarter 53 minutes ago
      This is a data storage system, so I guess yes, data is useful to train LLMs?

      Why does everything get turned into an LLM discussion?