What is the NYT's stance here? Is it pure spite? I guess their lawyers told them this is the winning move, and perhaps it is. But it just seems so blatantly wrong.
If you look at Reddit's r/ChatGPT, you'll quickly notice that the median use of ChatGPT is for therapy.
Is the NYT really ok with combing through people's therapy logs?
If you look at Reddit's r/ChatGPT, you'll quickly notice that the median use of ChatGPT is for therapy.
Is the NYT really ok with combing through people's therapy logs?
OpenAI should probably encrypt the chats and lock itself out going forward. Collect whatever metrics they need on the fly before locking.